ABSTRACT
Introduction: As fire pits grow in popularity, so do the associated burn injuries. Our study examines pediatric fire pit burns characteristics to raise awareness and promote safety precautions. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of pediatric patients (≤21 years) with firepit burns at a tertiary care hospital from 2016 to 2021. Results: Eighty-four patients were identified, of whom 70.2% were male, with a median age of 62 months. The median percent total body surface area burned was 2% (interquartile range (IQR)=1-4). Thirty-five (41.7%) patients were admitted and 7 (8.3%) underwent grafting. Neck and trunk burns had the highest grafting rates (66% and 33%, respectively). The hands (41.7%) and the lower extremities (27.4%) were the most frequently burned body areas. The leading causes of burns were ashes/hot coals (34.5%), flames (31.0%), and direct contact (25.0%), often resulting from falling into the fire (59.5%) or running or playing in activities near it (26.2%). Thirty-five (41.7%) were admitted for inpatient management, while 49 (58.3%) were treated as outpatient. Eleven (13.2%) underwent at least one reconstructive surgery, 7 (8.4%) had at least one rehabilitation visit, and 65 (77.4%) had follow-up clinic visits. The median length of stay was 2 days (IQR=1.0-3.5). The peak months for burns were from August through October (n=40, 46.0%), with an increase observed from 10 cases in 2016 to 20 cases in 2020. Conclusions: Given the significant proportion of firepit burns resulting from unsafe fire behaviors, it is crucial that caretakers are aware of proper firepit safety precautions. Level of evidence: III.
ABSTRACT
Importance: Sociodemographic and health characteristics of patients undergoing gender-affirming surgery (GAS) are currently unknown. Understanding these patient characteristics is vital to optimizing patient-centered care for transgender patients. Objective: To determine sociodemographic characteristics for the transgender population undergoing GAS. Collected sociodemographic information included the following: age, race/ethnicity, body metrics, hormone replacement therapy administration and duration, substance use, psychiatric comorbidities, and medical comorbidities. Evidence Review: A search of seven electronic databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Gender Studies) was used to find all articles on GAS from inception through May 2019. The 15,190 articles were then subjected to two levels of screening, and articles unrelated to gender-affirming care, unavailable in English, n<5, and with no outcomes reporting were excluded. Textbook chapters and letters were also excluded. Findings: A total of 406 studies were fully extracted, with 307 studies reporting age (n=22,727 patients), 19 reporting race/ethnicity (n=1184), 74 reporting body metrics (body mass index [BMI] n=6852, height n=416, and weight n=475), 58 reporting hormone therapies (n=5104), 56 reporting substance use (n=1146), 44 reporting psychiatric comorbidities (n=574), and 47 reporting medical comorbidities (n=573). From the 406 studies, 80 were done in the United States. Regarding U.S. studies, 59 studies reported age (n=5365), 10 reported race/ethnicity (n=709), 22 reported body metrics (BMI n=2519), 18 reported hormone therapies (n=3285), 15 reported substance use (n=478), 44 reported psychiatric comorbidities (n=394), and 47 reported medical comorbidities (n=293). Age was the most reported characteristic, reported in 75.62% of studies (73.75% of U.S. studies). Race/ethnicity was the least commonly reported data, reported in 4.68% of studies (12.50% of U.S. studies). Conclusions and Relevance: The type of sociodemographic information reported by GAS studies is inconsistently reported. To improve patient-centered care for transgender patients, further work is needed to create a standardization of collected sociodemographic information.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The allocation of scarce deceased donor kidneys is a complex process. Transplant providers are increasingly relying on constructs such as frailty and cognitive function to guide kidney transplant (KT) candidate selection. Patient views of the ethical issues surrounding the use of such constructs are unclear. We sought to assess KT candidates' attitudes and beliefs about the use of frailty and cognitive function to guide waitlist selection. METHODS: KT candidates were randomly recruited from an ongoing single-center cohort study of frailty and cognitive function. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, and thematic analysis was performed. Inductively derived themes were mapped onto bioethics principles. RESULTS: Twenty interviews were conducted (65% contact rate, 100% participation rate) (60% male; 70% White). With respect to the use of frailty and cognitive function in waitlisting decisions, four themes emerged in which participants: (1) valued maximizing a scarce resource (utility); (2) prioritized equal access to all patients (equity); (3) appreciated a proportional approach to the use of equity and utility (precautionary utility); and (4) sought to weigh utility- and equity-based concerns regarding social support. While some participants believed frailty and cognitive function were useful constructs to maximize utility, others believed their use would jeopardize equity. Patients were uncomfortable with using single factors such as frailty or cognitive impairment to deny someone access to transplantation; participants instead encouraged using the constructs to identify opportunities for intervention to improve frailty and cognitive function prior to KT. CONCLUSIONS: KT candidates' values mirrored the current allocation strategy, seeking to balance equity and utility in a just manner, albeit with conflicting viewpoints on the appropriate use of frailty and cognitive impairment in waitlisting decisions.
